Unterschiede
Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.
| Beide Seiten der vorigen Revision Vorhergehende Überarbeitung | |||
| electrical_engineering_and_electronics_2:task_5.2.6 [2025/09/19 16:00] – gelöscht - Externe Bearbeitung (Unbekanntes Datum) 127.0.0.1 | electrical_engineering_and_electronics_2:task_5.2.6 [2025/09/19 16:00] (aktuell) – ↷ Seitename wurde von electrical_engineering_and_electronics_2:task_1.1.4 auf electrical_engineering_and_electronics_2:task_5.2.6 geändert mexleadmin | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Zeile 1: | Zeile 1: | ||
| + | <panel type=" | ||
| + | <WRAP right> | ||
| + | {{drawio> | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Given is an arrangement of electric charges located in a vacuum (see picture on the right). \\ | ||
| + | The charges have the following values: | ||
| + | $Q_1=5 | ||
| + | $Q_2=-10 ~\rm{µC}$ (point charge) \\ | ||
| + | $Q_3= 0 ~\rm{C}$ (infinitely extended surface charge) | ||
| + | |||
| + | $\varepsilon_0=8.854\cdot 10^{-12} | ||
| + | |||
| + | 1. calculate the magnitude of the force of $Q_2$ on $Q_1$, without the force effect of $Q_3$. | ||
| + | |||
| + | <button size=" | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | 2. is this force attractive or repulsive? | ||
| + | |||
| + | <button size=" | ||
| + | The force is repulsive because both charges have the same sign. \\ \\ \\ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Now let $Q_2=0$ and the surface charge $Q_3$ be designed in such a way that a homogeneous electric field with $E_3=500 ~\rm{kV/m}$ results. \\ | ||
| + | What force (magnitude) now results on $Q_1$? | ||
| + | |||
| + | <button size=" | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | | ||
| + | \end{align*} \\ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||