Dies ist eine alte Version des Dokuments!
7. Networks at variable frequency
Introduction
At the previous chapters it was explained how the „influence of a sinusoidal current flow“ of capacitor and inductors look like. To describe this, the impedance was introduced. This can be understood as a complex resistance for sinusoidal excitation.
It applies to the capacitor:
\begin{align*} \underline{U}_C = \frac{1}{j\omega \cdot C} \cdot \underline{I}_C \quad \rightarrow \quad \underline{Z}_C = \frac{1}{j\omega \cdot C} \end{align*}
and for the inductance
\begin{align*} \underline{U}_L = j\omega \cdot L \cdot \underline{I}_L \quad \rightarrow \quad \underline{Z}_L = j\omega \cdot L \end{align*}
Complex impedances can be dealt with in much the same way as ohmic resistances in Electrical Engineering 1 (see: simple DC Circuits, linear Sources and two-terminal network, Analysis of DC Networks). In these transformations, the fraction $ j\omega \cdot$ is preserved. Circuits with impedances such as inductors and capacitors will show a frequency dependence accordingly.
Targets
After this lesson, you should:
- know that …
- know that … is formed.
- be able to … can …
7.1 From Two-Terminal Network to Four-Terminal Network
Until now, components such as resistors, capacitors and inductors have been understood as two-terminal. This is also obvious, since there are only two connections. In the following however circuits are considered, which behave similar to a voltage divider: On one side a voltage $U_I$ is applied, on the other side $U_O$ is formed with it. This results in 4 terminals. The circuit can and will be considered as a four-terminal network in the following. However, the input and output values will be complex.
For a four-terminal network, the relation of „what goes out“ (e.g. $\underline{U}_O$ or $\underline{U}_2$) to „what goes in“ (e.g. voltage $\underline{U}_I$ or $\underline{U}_1$) is important. Thus, the output and input variables ($\underline{U}_O$) and ($\underline{U}_I$) give the quotient:
\begin{align*} \underline{A} & = {{\underline{U}_O^\phantom{O}}\over{\underline{U}_I^\phantom{O}}} \\ & \text{with} \; \underline{U}_O = U_O \cdot e^{j \varphi_{uO}} \\ & \text{and} \; \underline{U}_I = U_I \cdot e^{j \varphi_{uI}} \\ \\ \underline{A} & = \frac {\underline{U}_O^\phantom{O}}{\underline{U}_I^\phantom{O}} = \frac {U_O \cdot e^{j \varphi_{uO}}}{U_I\cdot e^{j \varphi_{uI}}} \\ & = \frac {U_O}{U_I}\cdot e^{j (\varphi_{uO}-\varphi_{uI})} \\ \end{align*}
\begin{align*} \boxed{\underline{A} = \frac {\underline{U}_O^\phantom{O}}{\underline{U}_I^\phantom{O}} = \frac {U_O}{U_I}\cdot e^{j \Delta\varphi_{u}}} \end{align*}
Reminder:
- The complex-valued quotient ${\underline{U}_O}/{\underline{U}_I}$ is called the transfer function.
- The frequency-dependent magnitude of the quotient $A(\omega)={U_O}/{U_I}$ is called amplitude response and the angular difference $\Delta\varphi_{u}(\omega)$ is called phase response.
The frequency behaviour of the amplitude response and the frequency response is not only important in electrical engineering and electronics, but will also play a central role in control engineering.
7.2 RL Series Circuit
First, a series connection of a resistor $R$ and an inductor $L$ shall be considered (see Abbildung 2). This structure is also called RL-element.
Here, $\underline{U}_I= \underline{X_I} \cdot \underline{I}_I$ with $\underline{X}_I = R + j\omega \cdot L$ and corresponding for $\underline{U}_O$:
\begin{align*}
\underline{A} = \frac {\underline{U}_O^\phantom{O}}{\underline{U}_I^\phantom{O}} = \frac {\omega L}{\sqrt{R^2 + (\omega L)^2}}\cdot e^{j\left(\frac{\pi}{2} - arctan \frac{\omega L}{R} \right)}
\end{align*}
This results in the following for
- the amplitude response: $A = \frac {\omega L}{\sqrt{R^2 + (\omega L)^2}}$ and
- the phase response: $\Delta\varphi_{u} = arctan \frac{R}{\omega L} = \frac{\pi}{2} - arctan \frac{\omega L}{R}$
The main focus should first be on the amplitude response. Its frequency response can be derived from the equation in various ways.
- Extreme frequency consideration of this RL circuit (in the equation and in the system)
- Plotting amplitude and frequency response
- Determination of prominent frequencies
These three points are now to be gone through.
7.2.1 RL High Pass
For the first step we investigate the limit consideration: Wwe look at what happens, when the frequency $\omega$ runs to the definition range limits, i.e. $\omega \rightarrow 0$ and $\omega \rightarrow \infty$:
- For $\omega \rightarrow 0$, $A = \frac {\omega L}{\sqrt{R^2 + (\omega L)^2}} \rightarrow 0$ as the numerator approaches zero and the denominator remains greater than zero.
- For $\omega \rightarrow \infty$, $A \rightarrow1$, because in the root in the denominator $(\omega L)^2$ becomes larger and larger in the ratio $R^2$ to . So the root tends to $\omega L$ and thus to the numerator.
It can thus be seen that:
- at small frequencies there is no voltage $U_2$ at the output.
- at high frequencies $A = \frac {U_O}{U_I} = \rightarrow 1$, so the voltage at the output is equal to the voltage at the input.
Result:
The RL element shown here therefore only allows large frequencies to pass (= pass through) and small ones are filtered out.
The circuit corresponds to a high pass.
This can also be derived from understanding the components:
- At small frequencies, the current in the coil and thus the magnetic field changes only slowly. So only a negligibly small reverse voltage is induced. The coil acts like a short circuit at low frequencies.
- At higher frequencies, the current generated by $U_I$ through the coil changes faster, the induced voltage $U_i = - dI / dt$ becomes large.
As a result, the coil inhibits the current flow and a voltage drops across the coil. - If the frequency becomes very high, only a negligible current flows through the coil - and hence through the resistor. The voltage drop at $R$ thus approaches zero and the output voltage $U_O$ tends towards $U_I$.
The transfer function can also be decomposed into amplitude response and frequency response.
Often this plots are not given in with linear axis but:
- the amplitude response with a double logarithmic coordinate system and
- the phase response single logarithmic coordinate system.
By this, the course from low to high frequencies are easier to see. The following simulation in Abbildung 3 shows the amplitude response and frequency response in the lower left corner.
For further consideration, the equation of the transfer function $\underline{A} = \dfrac {\underline{U}_O^\phantom{O}}{\underline{U}_I^\phantom{O}}$ is to be rewritten so that it becomes independent of component values $R$ and $L$.
This allows for a generalized representation. This representation is called normalization:
$\large{\underline{A} = \frac {\underline{U}_O^\phantom{O}}{\underline{U}_I^\phantom{O}} = \frac {\omega L}{\sqrt{R^2 + (\omega L)^2}}\cdot e^{j\left(\frac{\pi}{2} - arctan \frac{\omega L}{R} \right)}}$ $ \quad \quad \vphantom{\HUGE{I \\ I}} \large{\xrightarrow{\text{normalization}}} \vphantom{\HUGE{I \\ I}} \quad \quad \quad $ $\large{\underline{A}_{norm} = \frac {\omega L / R}{\sqrt{1 + (\omega L / R)^2}}\cdot e^{j\left(\frac{\pi}{2} - arctan \frac{\omega L}{R} \right)} } $ $\large{= \frac {x}{\sqrt{1 + x^2}} \cdot e^{j\left(\frac{\pi}{2} - arctan x \right)} }$
This equation behaves quite the same as the one considered so far.
Abbildung 4 shows the two plots. On the x-axis, $x = \omega L / R$ has been plotted as the normalization variable. This represents a weighted frequency.
Here, too, the behavior determined in the limit value observation can be seen:
- at small frequencies $\omega$ (corresponds to small $x$), the amplitude response tends toward zero.
- At high frequencies, the ratio $U_O / U_I = 1 $ is established.
Interesting in the phase response is the point $x = 1$.
- Further to the left of this point (i.e. at smaller frequencies) a tenfold increase of the frequency $\omega$ produces a tenfold increase of $U_O / U_I$.
- Further to the right of this point (i.e. at higher frequencies) $U_O / U_I = 1$ remains.
So this point marks a limit. Far to the left, the ohmic resistance is significantly greater the amount of impedance of the coil: $R \gg \omega L$. far to the right is just the opposite.
The point $x=1$ just marks the cut-off frequency.
It holds
\begin{align*} \underline{A}_{norm} = \frac{x}{\sqrt{1 + x^2}} \cdot e^{j\left(\frac{\pi}{2} - arctan x \right)} = \frac{U_O}{U_I} \cdot e^{j\varphi} \quad \quad \left\{\begin{array}{l} x \ll 1 & \widehat{=}& \omega L \ll R &: \quad\quad \frac{U_O}{U_I}=x &, \varphi = \frac{\pi}{2} \, \widehat{=} \, 90° \\ x \gg 1 & \widehat{=}& \omega L \gg R &: \quad\quad \frac{U_O}{U_I}=1 &, \varphi = 0 \: \widehat{=} \, 0° \\ x = 1 & \widehat{=}& \omega L = R &: \quad\quad \frac{U_O}{U_I}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} &, \varphi = \frac{\pi}{4} \, \widehat{=} \, 45° \end{array} \right. \end{align*}
1 <\WRAP>
2 <\WRAP> <\WRAP>
\begin{align*} \underline{A}_{norm} = \frac{x}{\sqrt{1 + x^2}} \cdot e^{j\left(\frac{\pi}{2} - arctan x \right)} = \frac{U_O}{U_I} \cdot e^{j\varphi} | \left\{\begin{array}{l} \end{align*} <\WRAP>
\begin{align*} x \ll 1 & \widehat{=}& \omega L \ll R &: \quad\quad \frac{U_O}{U_I}=x &, \varphi = \frac{\pi}{2} \, \widehat{=} \, 90° \\ x \gg 1 & \widehat{=}& \omega L \gg R &: \quad\quad \frac{U_O}{U_I}=1 &, \varphi = 0 \: \widehat{=} \, 0° \\ x = 1 & \widehat{=}& \omega L = R &: \quad\quad \frac{U_O}{U_I}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} &, \varphi = \frac{\pi}{4} \, \widehat{=} \, 45° \end{array} \right. \end{align*} <\WRAP> <\WRAP>
Reminder:
- The cut-off frequency $f_c$ for high-pass and low-pass filters is the frequency at which the ohmic resistance just equals the value of the impedance.
- The cut-off frequency separates a range in which the filter allows signals through from one in which they are suppressed (=blocked).
- At the cut-off frequency, the phase $\varphi = 45°$ and the amplitude $A = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}$.
- In German the cut-off Frequency is called Grenzfrequenz $f_{Gr}$
These statements apply to single-stage passive filters, i.e. one RL or one RC element. Multistage filters are considered in circuit engineering.
The cut-off frequency in this case is given by:
\begin{align*} R &= \omega L \\ \omega_{c} &= \frac{R}{L} \\ 2 \pi f_{c} &= \frac{R}{L} \quad \rightarrow \quad \boxed{f_{c} = \frac{R}{2 \pi \cdot L}} \end{align*}
7.2.2 RL Low Pass
So far, only one variant of the RL element has been considered, namely the one where the output voltage $\underline{U}_O$ is tapped at the inductance.
Here we will briefly discuss what happens when the two components are swapped.
In this case, the normalized transfer function is given by:
\begin{align*} \underline{A}_{norm} = \frac {1}{\sqrt{1 + (\omega L / R)^2}}\cdot e^{-j \; arctan \frac{\omega L}{R} } \end{align*}
The cut-off frequency is again given by $f_{c} = \frac{R}{2 \pi \cdot L}$.
7.3 RC Series Circuit
7.3.1 RC High Pass
Now a voltage divider is to be constructed by a resistor $R$ and a capacity $C$. Quite similar to the previous chapters, the transfer function can also be determined here.
Here results as normalized transfer function:
\begin{align*} \underline{A}_{norm} = \frac {\omega RC}{\sqrt{1 + (\omega RC)^2}}\cdot e^{\frac{\pi}{2}-j \; arctan (\omega RC) } \end{align*}
In this case, the normalization variable $x = \omega RC$. Again, the cut-off frequency is determined by equating $R$ and the magnitude of the impedance of the capacitance:
\begin{align*} R &= \frac{1}{\omega_{c} C} \\ \omega_{c} &= \frac{1}{RC} \\ 2 \pi f_{c} &= \frac{1}{RC} \quad \rightarrow \quad \boxed{f_{c} =\frac{1}{2 \pi\cdot RC} } \end{align*}
7.3.2 RC Low Pass
Again, the voltage at the impedance is to be used as the output voltage. This results in a low-pass filter.
Here results as normalized transfer function:
\begin{align*} \underline{A}_{norm} = \frac {1}{\sqrt{1 + (\omega RC)^2}}\cdot e^{-j \; arctan (\omega RC) } \end{align*}
Also, the cut-off frequency is given by $f_{c} =\frac{1}{2 \pi\cdot RC}$